🔗 Share this article

Tehran is prepared to restart nuclear talks with Washington provided that it is approached with "dignity" and "respect", Iran's top diplomat has stated.

The Iranian diplomat declared exclusively dialogue was effective, and disclosed fresh requests had originated from intermediaries to reopen negotiations with the US government. He asserted Iran possessed no secret atomic facilities, and Iran had not yet reached a point to authorize the UN nuclear inspectorate to access bombed nuclear sites for safety concerns.

Navigating a Difficult Route

Araghchi is treading a challenging path since Iran aims to avoid appear to be operating from a position of weakness, and he emphatically stated that Iran had emerged more resilient in military terms and emotionally from the joint assault on its nuclear sites in June.

He was speaking at a defense forum in Tehran where he reiterated that Iran had "a fundamental entitlement to enrich uranium on home soil that it will never give up" – the key factor of the stalemate in the prior discussions.

Prior Discussions Unexpectedly Ended

The earlier sessions of discussions between the United States and Iran were ended suddenly and acrimonious termination on 12 June when Israel, with American backing, attacked Iranian nuclear sites in a 12-day war that culminated with Donald Trump asserting the facilities had been eliminated. Afterward, European countries exercised their authority to restore global restrictions, but Iran asserts they have not had a substantial consequence.

Magic Solution Suggested

Iranian officials stated they felt they had reached a "magic solution" to the nuclear fuel concern in previous talks, when it was settled an domestic cooperative with US participation could refine atomic fuel. Each party would have been able to assert triumph since local refinement would have continued and the US could be confident that Iran's enrichment initiative was solely for peaceful purposes.

It had not been decided in the discussions that American atomic experts could function on Iranian soil, but that was a logical implication of the partnership suggestion. Representatives stated three times they had secured an understanding with Trump's special envoy Steve Witkoff only for the agreement to collapse due to "detractors in America".

Current Status

Tehran representatives declared the partnership proposal was now withdrawn, but it seems very probable the proposal could be revived in some form if talks reopen.

The US president in recent days stated he had been receiving messages that Iran sought to restart talks, but in private Iranian officials state they are not yet receiving clear proposals from Washington either straightforwardly or from significant local go-betweens, such as the Qatari government, the Egyptian leadership, the Omani authorities and the Saudi kingdom. The Tehran's diplomatic corps has been criticized of inactivity in the wake of Washington's unmediated tactics, but Tehran asserts dialogue is not part of a show.

Negotiating Stance

In his address to the gathering, aimed to paint the US as a controlling nation that exploits the concept of international law, Araghchi said the 12-day war demonstrated the dispute could not be ended by combat operations. He said the strikes began with a American requirement for an total Iran submission and concluded with an unconditional call for a ceasefire.

Iran is assured the initial Israeli attacks were carried out with full US knowledge and cooperation, making trust difficult to restore.

Dialogue Remains the Ultimate Answer

Araghchi said: "Tehran was not the one that had deserted negotiations; it was America and the European states that had always tried to dictate their will during the discussions. Negotiations can still be viable and remains the final solution to address conflicts, but its standards, regulations and fundamentals must be respected."

"If they talk to the Iranian people with the language of dignity and honor, they will receive a response in the same tone."

Recovery and Rebuilding

In what is portrayed by Iran's diplomats as the conflict of repair and rebuilding, the foreign minister claimed he was confident Iran's defence capabilities "are considerably enhanced than preceding 13 or 14 June of this year. Every aspect of our defense have been restored. We learned multiple understandings from this engagement; we have come to know our internal vulnerabilities and the weaknesses of the opponent."

He stated: "We successfully passed this conflict. Our enrichment knowledge, which they planned to destroy, remains in place. The installations and machinery, if eliminated, will be reconstructed; what is crucial is the will of the citizens of Tehran and then the social solidarity that they targeted, but did not succeed to break. The citizens of Tehran have become stronger, more cohesive, and more supportive of the administration and the country in the aftermath of this invasion."